For smaller files it works better to have more threads, but it's important that the utility pre-allocates the files, to reduce fragmentation. copying a lot of larger files can benefit from fewer threads. There are down sides to multithreading though, e.g. Comparing EMCopy to RoboCopy with the same number of threads, EMCopy is 25-35% faster. RoboCopy does support 128 threads on new versions of Windows 2008R2 and above. Multithreading: EMCopy supports up to 256 threads.I'll just give you a few quick points of what works better with EMCopy. It is a free data migration tool, CLI only, and has a lot of features that just seem to work better than RoboCopy.
#EMCOPY 64 DOWNLOAD TRIAL#
What I have found on a long quest of trial and error is a utility called "EMCopy" from EMC. However, I've gotten to the point where RoboCopy is just not fast enough. First off, I love RoboCopy, I've used it for over a decade now, and I have no issues with it.
0 kommentar(er)
